Ratushyn Yu. A., Polenok S. P.

 

Constitution of the Digital Society:
Principles, Patterns, Replications

 

 

·        Constitution of Freedom: Personal sovereignty, individual civic property, and economic individualism.

·        Freedom limited by equality and justice.

·        Comprehensive peaceful coexistence, inclusive security, Civilizational Ethics (Civilism).

·        Principles – patterns – replications.

·        Meanings – concepts – motivations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary

 

 

CONTENTS

 

EDITORIAL

Foreword: On the New System of International Security … 5
Analytical conclusion prepared with AI assistance

The New System of International Security

Terms and Meanings in the Constitution of the Digital Society … 17
Where to Start … 22

Architecture of Defining Polycentric Principles in the Neuro-Polycentric Digital Institutional Platform (DIP) … 28

 

Human Being in the Digital Society:

 

Chapter I. General Principles of the Digital Society (Architecture) … 39
Chapter II. Digital Sovereignty of the Individual … 64
Chapter III. Rights of the Digital Person in a Polycentric Institution … 72
Chapter IV. Duties of the Digital Person … 100
Chapter V. The Institute of Personal Sovereignty (Digital Accounts) in Polycentric Institutions … 105
Chapter VI. Digital Polycentric Institutions of Sovereign Individuals … 116

 

 

Digital Property in the Digital Society:

 

Chapter VII. Digital Property … 148
Chapter VIII. Social Passive Income in the Digital Society … 158
Chapter IX. Passive Income and Economic Distribution in the Digital Society … 187

 

 

Digital Institutional Platform:

 

Chapter X. Digital Institutional Platform of Digital Law … 229
Chapter XI. Authority in the Digital Society and the Role of the Digital Institutional Platform … 235

 

 

General Model of Neuro-Legal Interaction:

 

Chapter XII. Neuro-Legal Regulation … 250
Chapter XIII. Transition to Digital Sovereignty and Governance of Digital Institutions … 260
Chapter XIV. Adaptation to Technological Challenges and Innovations … 269
Chapter XV. Wealth Redistribution and Fair Access to Resources … 283

 

 

Institutions for Regulating the Digital Society:

 

Chapter XVI. The Institute of Charity in the Legal Digital Society … 300
Chapter XVII. New System of International Security Based on the Digital Society … 317
Chapter XVIII. Ending Perpetual Wars: The Role of Digital Polycentric Institutions in Global Security … 342
Chapter XIX. Addressing Climate Change and Human Responsibility … 352

 

Artificial Intelligence and Self-Organization:

 

Chapter XX. Artificial Intelligence and Self-Organization … 375
Chapter XXI. Governance of AI and Technological Innovations in the DIP … 401
Chapter XXII. Accountability of Autonomous Systems and Automated Governance … 416

 

 

“Digital Citizenship and International Interaction”

 

Chapter XXIII. International Cooperation, Personal Sovereignty, and Interaction with States … 435

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

EDITORIAL:

General Imperative for the Draft Constitution of the Digital Society

 

The Constitution of the Digital Society is a system-forming legal document of a new civilizational paradigm, emerging in response to the exhaustion of the industrial world order, the collapse of traditional sovereignty architectures, and the declining effectiveness of classical models of international security. It defines and describes the principles, mechanisms, structures, and institutions of the digital age, in which humans, property, and interaction institutions are transformed into digital equivalents with new functional roles and legal statuses.

 

 

1. Mission of the Document — From Industrialism to Digital Civilization

 

The Constitution records the transition from an industrial model with centralized, territorially-bound hierarchies to a global polycentric digital order, where the main mechanisms of social organization are:

 

 

2. Central Formula: Freedom Limited by Equality and Justice

The key philosophical imperative of the Constitution is freedom, realized not in anarchy, but within the framework of equal access and social justice. This model:

 

3. Architecture of the Digital Society

The structure of the Constitution is not merely a description of rights and duties but a platform for a system of digital social contract, where:

 

4. Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility, and Self-Regulation

The sections reveal an innovative approach to institutionalizing AI as a controlled and accountable entity within the digital legal order. Introduced mechanisms include:

This represents the first attempt to create a sustainable model for preventing ethical disasters in the field of autonomous technologies.

 

5. Digital Citizenship, Global Cooperation, and Justice

The Constitution defines digital citizenship as a form of global participation in addressing issues of common concern — from security to climate. This citizenship:

 

6. The New System of International Security

The Constitution develops the idea of post-Westphalian security — not as mutual deterrence between states, but as institutionally-managed interaction of digital persons in the digital domain. Security here is based on:

The Constitution effectively serves as the legal foundation for the project of ending perpetual wars through a platform of polycentric institutions.

 

7. Conclusion: The Document as a Polycentric Platform of a New Civilization

The Constitution does not merely describe the “rules of the digital game” — it proposes a polycentric interaction model of a new civilizational paradigm, where:

The book develops and presents the authors’ concepts of the Constitution of the Digital Society, encompassing the ethical, legal, and technological aspects of harmony among freedom, equality, and justice.

 

1. Humanity at the Threshold of the Digital Age

The world has entered the deepest phase of transformation in the history of civilization.
The mechanical era has exhausted itself — replaced by the digital society, where reality is determined not by geography or force, but by information, ethics, and interaction algorithms.

We are no longer mere users of technology — we have become its environment.
Technology shapes our decisions, language, thinking, economy, and even our conception of freedom.
Yet humanity now faces a crucial question:
Can civilization remain moral in a world governed not by humans but by algorithms?

 

1.1. The Civilizational Crisis Point

Old institutions — states, financial systems, international unions — were built on hierarchies of power and coercion.
They can no longer ensure stability in a world of global interconnectedness, where boundaries between nations, markets, and consciousness are dissolving.
Instead of balance, we have global chaos — chaos of data, interests, and responsibility.

What was once called “order” has become an architecture of uncertainty.
Humanity, having invented artificial intelligence, must learn to live not only with it but within it — in a new structure of existence, where every signal, action, or decision leaves a digital imprint.

This is not just a technological revolution.
It is an anthropological rupture, in which humans, for the first time in history, create a world where the boundary between “I” and “Information” disappears.
In this rupture, the old morality collapses because it cannot keep pace with the speed of coded innovation.
Yet, at the same time, it creates the opportunity to develop a new morality — digital, based not on coercion but on an ethical algorithm of balance.

 

1.2. The Birth of Digital Society

Digital society is not a collection of network users,
but a new form of civilizational life where humans, digital persons, and artificial intelligence operate within a shared ethical field of a new civic society.
It is not a virtual copy of the world — it is a new dimension of its harmonization.

Replacing traditional state institutions are Digital Polycentric Institutes (DPI) — self-regulated centers of ethical decision-making, interconnected within the Digital Institutional Platform (DIP).
Here, instead of laws in the classical sense, digital patterns operate — formulas of moral logic regulating interactions between humans, communities, AI systems, and states.
This forms a new model of world order — not through control, but through harmonization.

 

1.3. Ukraine as a Point of Synthesis

Ukraine, which today is tested by war while simultaneously creating a new digital state infrastructure, becomes the ethical and institutional core of transition.
It demonstrates that digital freedom is possible even under the pressure of force,
and that technology can serve not as a tool of control but as a tool of dignity.
Ukraine is not the periphery of digital civilization but its laboratory of the future,
where the model of combining humanity, technology, and morality is being born.

From here unfolds the concept of the Constitution of the Digital Society — a document of a new type that does not merely describe order but establishes an ethical-algorithmic foundation for the functioning of civilization.
It does not impose laws — it creates algorithms of coexistence, where freedom is limited by equality, and equality is balanced by justice.

 

1.4. From Coercion to Coordination

The goal of this new Constitution is not domination, but alignment.
It does not replace national legal systems but integrates them into a global field of moral coherence.
In this field, every action, transaction, or institutional decision passes through an ethical filter —
not through punishment, but through the replication of correctness.

Thus begins a new era of civilizational ethics — where humans do not fight for power,
but tune the system toward harmony.
And this is the mission of the book: to show that
digital society is not about technology, but morality.
Not about control, but balance.
Not about force, but coordinated coexistence.

 

The Constitution of the Digital Society is the first attempt to create a moral architecture for digital civilization.
It lays the foundation for a new global law, where freedom becomes an algorithm,
equality a structure, and justice a program of peace.

 

2. Human Beings and the Digital Person

 

2.1. Humanity at the Threshold of the Digital Age

Humanity is entering the deepest phase of transformation in its history.
Old models of social organization — states, bureaucracies, vertical hierarchies of power — can no longer ensure stability in a world where information and algorithms determine not only the economy but also morality, politics, social relationships, and even our understanding of freedom.

The mechanical era is coming to an end, giving way to a digital civilization — an environment where humans do not merely use technology but become an inseparable part of the digital system. All our actions, decisions, and thoughts leave a digital trace, and interaction with algorithms shapes new boundaries of moral and ethical space.

In this new reality, traditional laws and power structures yield to algorithms of coordination, where control is replaced by harmonization and coercion by ethical balance. Humanity stands at the threshold of an anthropological rupture: the boundary between the “I” and information disappears, and old moral reference points cannot keep pace with the speed of change.

At the same time, a unique opportunity arises — to create a digital morality based on ethical replications rather than external coercion. It ensures mutual responsibility among humans, digital persons, and artificial intelligence, forming an environment where every signal and every decision passes through an ethical algorithm.

This era opens the space for a new civilizational architecture, where Ukraine, with its contemporary challenges and digital innovations, becomes the core of an ethical and institutional experiment. Here emerges the concept of global harmony, where freedom, equality, and justice are integrated into a digital mode of existence.

We are on the verge not merely of a technological revolution, but of transforming humanity into a subject capable of creating and sustaining moral order in a world of algorithms and data. This is a new generation of civilizational responsibility — the civilism of the digital age.

 

2.2. The Digital Person and New Forms of Responsibility

In the digital era, humans cease to be only physical subjects of law — they become digital persons, integrated into a system of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence. The digital person does not exist as an abstract avatar but as an active participant in interaction within the Digital Institutional Platform (DIP).

A new type of responsibility emerges: ethical and digital. Every decision, action, or transaction of a digital person leaves a trace subject to algorithmic evaluation within the ethical patterns of DPI. Artificial intelligence becomes not only a tool but also an extension of the consciousness of the digital person, accountable to their moral orientation.

This means responsibility is no longer an external coercion but a systemic property. The digital person is accountable for their algorithms, interactions with other digital subjects, and outcomes generated through their digital influence. A new social ecology of interdependence arises, where morality and technology merge into a unified system.

 

2.3. Digital Polycentric Institutes as the Basis for Global Harmony

In a world where boundaries between states, markets, and consciousness vanish, traditional institutions lose the ability to ensure stability. Their place is taken by Digital Polycentric Institutes (DPI) — self-regulating ethical centers that coordinate interactions among digital persons, communities, and artificial intelligence systems.

DPIs create decision-making models based on replications of moral coherence. They do not command or control but ensure the harmonization of actions and interests through digital patterns — algorithms that automatically maintain a balance of freedom, equality, and justice.

Each DPI is a node in the global Digital Institutional Platform, where information, ethics, and algorithms combine into a single system. This structure forms a new model of world order — not vertical but networked; not through coercion, but through coordinated responsibility and ethical replication.

Digital polycentric institutes form the foundation for the Constitution of the Digital Society — a document that sets the rules of interaction in this new environment and defines the algorithms of ethical behavior at the global level.

 

 

3. Digital Society as a System of Civilizational Relations

Digital society is not merely a technical or economic system. It is a new civilizational structure, where all social, political, and economic relations acquire a digital dimension, and morality and ethics become algorithmically replicated principles of interaction.

3.1. Three Core Institutions: Human Being, Property, Eternal Values

At the center of digital society are three fundamental institutions:

  1. Human Being — not only a physical person but a digital person acting in the digital environment. They bear full responsibility for their actions and interaction algorithms within the network, becoming an active subject of civilizational relations.
  2. Property — not only material or financial assets but digital and intellectual property existing within the Digital Institutional Platform. Property in digital society becomes a tool for stability and ethical balance, ensuring the rights and obligations of participants in the system.
  3. Eternal Values — Freedom, Equality, Justice. These principles form the structural basis of algorithmic morality in digital society. Freedom is the ability to act according to ethical patterns, equality is the balance among all participants’ interests, and justice is a digital algorithm correcting actions and restoring harmony.

 

3.2. Civilism as a Synthesis of Ethics, Law, and Technology

Digital society gives rise to a new civilizational paradigm — civilism, combining three foundations:

Civilism does not reject traditional norms but transforms them into a digital model of interaction, where all decisions pass through an ethical algorithm and replication of correctness.

 

3.3. A New Type of Social Contract

In digital society, the social contract ceases to be an act of subordination. It becomes a system of balanced interaction, where:

Thus, digital society emerges as an organic system of civilizational relations, where ethics, law, and technology integrate into a unified mechanism of harmony. This is a new type of civilizational stability, where order arises not through control or coercion but through coordination of freedom, equality, and justice in the digital environment.

 

4. The Digital Institutional Platform (DIP) — Technological Foundation of the Constitution

The Digital Institutional Platform (DIP) serves as the fundamental civilizational infrastructure of the digital age, supporting the functioning of digital society as an organic system of harmony, where freedom, equality, and justice are implemented through algorithms rather than vertical control structures.

The DIP is the technological foundation of the Constitution of the Digital Society, as it enables the replication of ethical and legal principles across all layers of digital interaction. It transforms morality and law into systemic algorithms accessible to every participant on the platform.

 

4.1. Polycentric Organization (DPI) without Centralized Control

The foundation of the Digital Institutional Platform (DIP) consists of Digital Polycentric Institutes (DPI) — autonomous centers of ethical decision-making. Each DPI coordinates its activities independently, while simultaneously integrating into the platform’s network structure through harmonization algorithms.

The principle of DPI operation lies in mutual synchronization of interests, rather than centralized control. The replication of ethical patterns ensures the alignment of actions among digital persons, communities, and state institutions, creating network stability without coercion.

 

4.2. Neurochain: The Coordination Network of DPIs

For effective interaction, DPIs use a neurochain — a network of interconnected nodes where each DPI functions as a “neuron” within the global system. The neurochain ensures:

 

4.3. Digital Contracts and Ethical Synchronization Algorithms

Within the DIP, digital contracts are implemented — automated agreements between digital persons, DPIs, and other institutions that ensure compliance with interaction rules.

These contracts work in conjunction with ethical synchronization algorithms, which automatically:

Thus, the DIP becomes both the technological and ethical framework of the Constitution of the Digital Society, integrating morality, law, and technology into a unified platform of harmonious interaction. Authority is replicated through algorithms, rather than concentrated in a centralized institution, creating a new model of civilizational stability in the digital age.

 

 

5. Ethics and Digital Law

In digital society, ethics and law are integrated into a single system, where morality becomes a structural component of legal subjectivity. Traditional law is based on punishment and control, whereas digital law is oriented toward the harmonization of actions and interactions, where each participant not only complies with rules but is responsible for their replication in the digital environment.

 

5.1. Ethical Responsibility as the Basis of Digital Legal Personality

A digital person bears full ethical responsibility for their actions, decisions, and algorithms they create or use. Responsibility covers both material and digital resources, as well as the influence on other participants in the system.

Ethical legal personality becomes a key criterion for participation in the Digital Institutional Platform (DIP): only those subjects whose actions align with ethical patterns can fully participate in the system. In this way, morality ceases to be an abstract concept and becomes a practical tool of social stability.

 

5.2. Digital Law as a Harmonization System

Digital law is not a set of prohibitions or repressive mechanisms. It creates a structure of harmonization, where ethical synchronization algorithms ensure alignment of interests, resources, and actions of all participants on the platform.

In such a system, violations are not punished by force but corrected through the replication of correct actions across the network. The actions of a digital person are automatically evaluated according to the principles of:

 

5.3. From “Prohibitions” to “Coordination”: Morality as a Legal Tool

In digital society, morality becomes a legal instrument. Instead of commands and prohibitions, the legislation of the digital era forms algorithms of mutual responsibility, automatically synchronizing participants’ actions.

This transformation allows a shift from a model of coercion to a model of coordinated interaction, where:

Digital law becomes a bridge between ethics and technology, ensuring the stability of civilizational relations and creating a foundation for a new-generation global order. It confirms the core idea of digital society: freedom, equality, and justice are realized through moral harmonization, not through control or coercion.

 

6. Algorithms of Freedom, Equality, and Justice in the Constitution of the Digital Society

Digital society requires a new approach to fundamental values — freedom, equality, and justice. Traditional definitions cannot ensure stability in an environment of digital interaction, where each action leaves a trace in the global system. In the Constitution of the Digital Society, these principles are transformed into algorithms that form the moral and legal basis for interaction.

 

6.1. Formula: Freedom Limited by Equality and Justice

The key concept of digital civilizational ethics is expressed by the formula:

Freedom = the ability to act within limits defined by equality and justice.

Freedom is no longer absolute. It is realized only in the context of:

This formula allows the digital society to be both dynamic and stable, where individual autonomy is combined with responsibility to the community.

 

6.2. Balance as the Universal Law of Digital Civilizational Ethics

Balance in digital civilizational ethics becomes a universal law, regulating all social, economic, and institutional interactions. It ensures:

Balance is achieved not through force but through algorithms that replicate moral coherence, maintaining platform stability and preserving its civilizational integrity.

 

6.3. Algorithmic Justice — A Mechanism of Equilibrium in the DIP

Algorithmic justice is a central mechanism of the Digital Institutional Platform (DIP). It automatically:

Thanks to algorithmic justice, digital society acquires a self-regulating system, where no external control is needed, and harmony is maintained automatically. This allows the Constitution of the Digital Society to function as a living instrument of civilizational stability, ensuring a balance of freedom, equality, and justice in the digital environment.

 

7. Constitution of the Digital Society — Foundation of Global Digital Law

Digital society requires not only technological solutions and algorithms but also an ethical and legal framework that ensures stability, harmony, and predictability. This foundation is the Constitution of the Digital Society — a new type of document that integrates morality, law, and technology into a unified platform of interaction.

 

7.1. Mission of the Constitution: Harmonizing the Digital World through Ethical Algorithms

The mission of the Constitution is to harmonize the digital world, where freedom, equality, and justice are realized not through coercion but through algorithmic mechanisms.

It establishes ethical algorithms that:

This mission transforms the Constitution into a living instrument, ensuring moral coherence and technological stability in the global digital environment.

 

7.2. Patterns and Replications as the Basis for DPI Operation

The Constitution defines patterns and replications, which form the foundation of DPI operations.

Thanks to the replication of ethical patterns, the platform can ensure network stability, prevent conflicts, and maintain consistency of decisions on a global scale.

 

7.3. The Constitution as a Source of Algorithms for Moral Equilibrium

The Constitution becomes a source of algorithms for moral equilibrium, which:

Thus, it functions as a living ethical code, integrating moral norms into the digital infrastructure.

 

7.4. Role of the Constitution in Forming International Digital Law

The Constitution of the Digital Society is not limited by national borders. It becomes the first attempt to establish global digital law, where:

In this context, the Constitution becomes the foundation of a new global order, where digital law combines morality, technology, and international interaction. It demonstrates that global stability in the digital age is achievable not through control or force, but through ethical algorithms, pattern replications, and networked harmony.

The Constitution of the Digital Society is not just a normative document but a structural framework of digital civilization, setting rules for all platform participants and ensuring continuous reproduction of moral equilibrium at the global level.

 

8. Constitution, Artificial Intelligence, and Responsibility of the Digital Person

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has already become an integral component of digital society. However, its role fundamentally differs from traditional legal subjects: AI is not an independent legal entity, but functions as a tool of the digital person and polycentric institutes (DPIs).

 

8.1. AI as a Tool, Not a Subject

The Constitution of the Digital Society clearly defines that AI is embedded within DPIs and digital platforms to support decision-making processes, optimize resources, and ensure the replication of ethical patterns.

AI does not possess autonomous legal subjectivity:

 

8.2. The Digital Person Bears Full Responsibility for the Actions of Their AI

A key principle of digital civilizational ethics is the complete moral and legal responsibility of the digital person for the actions of AI.

This means:

Thus, AI enhances human autonomy without absolving responsibility, emphasizing the need for conscious and ethical use of technology.

 

8.3. Rules of Ethical Interaction Between AI, Humans, and Society

The Constitution of the Digital Society establishes universal interaction patterns covering:

These rules ensure balanced, transparent, and predictable behavior of AI, supporting the replication of moral patterns within the DIP and the global network.

 

8.4. Foundation of a New Digital Ethics

Integrating AI into the Constitution forms a new digital ethics, where technology becomes an extension of human conscience.

Digital ethics includes:

In this system, the digital person and AI form a framework in which morality and law are realized through a technological platform, and society gains a self-regulation mechanism without external coercion.

The Constitution of the Digital Society ensures that technology never replaces humans, but becomes their extension in decision-making, providing ethical coherence on a global scale.

 

 

9. International Hub for Sustainable Development Projects in the Context of the Constitution of the Digital Society

The International Hub for Sustainable Development Projects (hereinafter — the Hub) establishes a new type of institutional platform, where digital society, technology, and ethics are integrated into a single system. Within this system, the Constitution of the Digital Society serves as the normative and ethical foundation of the Hub, ensuring the alignment of actions between digital persons, polycentric institutes, and international projects.

 

9.1. Constitution as the Normative and Ethical Foundation of the Hub

The Constitution sets out principles, algorithms, and patterns that form the basis for the Hub’s operations:

Thus, the Hub does not merely coordinate projects but functions as a system of moral and legal alignment, where freedom, equality, and justice are realized through the replication of digital patterns.

 

9.2. Reflection of the Constitution in the Hub’s Statute

The Hub’s Statute integrates the principles of the Constitution into the structure and powers of its governance bodies:

This structure guarantees that constitutional principles are implemented in practice, creating a platform for effective management of international sustainable development projects.

 

9.3. Impact on Digital Law and the DIP Ecosystem

The Hub’s Constitution forms a model of digital law that:

As a result, the Hub becomes a center for the development of international patterns of digital ethics and law, influencing global sustainable development projects.

 

9.4. Constitution as a Tool for International Harmonization

The Constitution provides the Hub with a universal ethical and legal framework, allowing it to:

Thus, the Hub implements the concept of global digital harmony, where the Constitution becomes a practical instrument for integrating morality, law, and technology into international projects.

 

10. Constitution as the Foundation of the New System of International Security

The modern world stands on the threshold of radical changes in the understanding of security and stability. Traditional models were based on the balance of power, where control and coercion defined relations between states. In the digital age, this approach becomes insufficient. The Constitution of the Digital Society proposes a new security paradigm based on ethical balance, replication of moral patterns, and digital harmony.

 

10.1. From Balance of Power to Balance of Ethics

The new system of international security moves away from the concept of domination through military or economic advantage. Instead, it focuses on ethical equilibrium, where:

This transformation reduces the conflict potential of the international system, turning possible crises into opportunities for coordination and development.

 

10.2. Digital Polycentric Institutes as Guarantees of Stability

Digital polycentric institutes (DPIs) serve as key guarantors of stability. They coordinate activities on a global scale, ensure ethical compliance, and maintain system equilibrium:

Thus, system stability is achieved through self-regulation, where moral algorithms replace traditional mechanisms of coercion and dominance.

 

10.3. The Hub as a Mechanism of Comprehensive Peace

The International Hub for Sustainable Development Projects becomes a tool for implementing the New Security System:

The Hub functions as a mechanism of comprehensive peace, where technology, ethics, and law combine to support stability and predictability in international relations.

 

10.4. Ukraine as a Point of Balance Among Global Centers

In this new system, Ukraine serves as an ethical and institutional point of balance. It demonstrates that:

In this context, the Constitution of the Digital Society becomes the foundation of the New System of International Security, where ethics, technology, and digital law form a stable and predictable order, capable of replacing traditional power-balance models and creating conditions for comprehensive peace.

 

 

11. The Constitutional Formula for Comprehensive Peace

Digital society is not merely a technological era but a new stage in humanity’s moral evolution. It demonstrates that civilizational development is no longer limited to material or military resources. True progress is measured by the ability to integrate freedom, equality, and justice into global coexistence, where every action leaves a digital trace and impacts the entire network of interactions.

 

11.1. Constitution as a Living Algorithm of Harmony

The Constitution of the Digital Society becomes a living algorithm, which not only establishes rules but maintains harmony between freedom, equality, and justice:

This algorithm allows the Constitution to autonomously sustain moral equilibrium, adapting to new conditions and challenges of the digital environment.

 

11.2. The Path of Civilizational Ethics — From Chaos to Coordinated Coexistence

Digital society emerges amid global chaos — a chaos of data, interests, and responsibility. The path of civilizational ethics lies in transforming this chaos into coordinated coexistence through ethical algorithms and digital patterns:

As a result, chaos transforms into a predictable and stable structure of interactions, where moral equilibrium becomes a foundation for development rather than merely an ideal.

 

11.3. Digital Law as an Instrument of Comprehensive Peace

The Constitution of the Digital Society lays the foundation for digital law, serving as a tool for comprehensive peace:

Thus, the Constitutional Formula for Comprehensive Peace transforms digital society into a viable model of civilized coexistence, where freedom, equality, and justice are not merely declarative values but operational algorithms for global harmony.

This is not utopia — it represents a new stage of human development, where technology serves moral order, and digital law becomes a living tool for ensuring stability, peace, and harmony at a planetary level.