Executive Summary
New System of International Security (NSIS)

1. Introduction: Humanity at the Point of No Return

Modern civilization faces systemic instability encompassing geopolitical, climatic, social, and technological risks. The traditional architecture of international security, based on the balance of power, has exhausted its potential. Conflicts have become global, and old deterrence mechanisms no longer ensure stability.

The NSIS project proposes a new security paradigm: ethics, shared responsibility, and coordinated development as the foundation of stability. The goal is to create a synergistic system where security and development are integrated into a single process.

2. From a Deterrence System to a System of Harmony

The old security model was based on fear and balance of power, which in the digital era generates new threats: cyberattacks, data manipulation, economic sanctions.

NSIS proposes three key principles:

• Polycentrism — a network of equal institutions coordinating development and security through trust.
• Ethical Governance — integration of moral standards into algorithms and AI.
• Digital Interconnectedness — transparent circulation of data and resources.

3. International Hub and Digital Institutional Platform (DIP)

To implement NSIS in practice, an International Hub for Sustainable Development (IHSDP) and a digital DIP are established.

The Hub coordinates development projects, ensures transparency and trust among states, corporations, and citizens.

DIP is a polycentric network where each participant has a digital identity, rights, and responsibilities. It supports:

• registration of rights,
• ethical contracts,
• monitoring sustainable development,
• creation of a Civic Passive Income (CPI).

4. Egalitarian Digital Society

The digital society is based on:

• Sovereignty of the individual — digital identity ensures independence from the state.
• Digital property — knowledge and information become the foundation of economic value.
• Self-organization through trust — ethical patterns regulate interaction.
• Civic Passive Income — guarantees a basic level of material security and economic participation.

This creates a balance of freedom, equality, and justice.

5. Dual Citizenship

• National level preserves cultural identity, legal systems, and internal security.
• Global digital level ensures participation in international projects through DIP.
• Synchronization via digital interfaces guarantees multi-level stability: in a national-level crisis, digital institutions maintain societal functioning.

6. Ethics as a Security Regulator

Ethical algorithms of DIP serve as a self-regulating mechanism:

• Actions of actors are evaluated through ethical patterns.
• AI is integrated into the system with ethical constraints.
• Ethics ensures balance and trust, replacing control and coercion.

7. Mathematical Models of Harmony

• Harmony patterns — algorithmic functions that minimize system entropy.
• Polycentrism balance ensures stability through interdependence of centers of influence.
• Replication of development — ideas and projects scale without losing ethical and economic context.
• Trust as a stability metric — a measurable variable guiding interactions.

8. Institutional Implementation Mechanisms

• International Hub — coordinator of sustainable development, self-organizing neural network.
• DIP — digital foundation for governance, CPI, digital property, and ethical algorithms.
• States and international organizations move from control to partnership, maintaining the role of ethics guarantors.

9. Innovation-Economic Dynamics

• New economy of value — digital property, trust, and participation.
• Innovation as a function of ethics — coordinated through ethical algorithms, integrating new technologies into a human-centered architecture.
• Civic income markets form global social security.
• Civilization transition phases: synchronization (2025–2030), integration (2030–2040), harmonization (after 2040).

10. Global Scenarios for NSIS Implementation

• USA — digital ethical leadership, transformation of defense spending into a peace fund.
• EU — legal polycentrism, green and digital policy.
• China — stability-oriented economy, integration of technologies and climate solutions.
• Ukraine — laboratory of new security, digital transformation, and reconstruction.
• Africa — partnership through knowledge and innovation.
• India — digital democracy, climate adaptation, ethical innovation.
• Brazil — digital ethics and social responsibility.
• Australia and Oceania — climate adaptation laboratory.
• Middle East — energy transformation and cultural synergy.
• Southeast Asia — digital flexibility and polycentric governance.
• Latin America — digital justice and social integration.
• Russia — three integration scenarios: Eurasian, European, or hybrid; alternatively — Ukraine as a security coordinator.

Conclusion

NSIS proposes a new civilizational contract: security as a function of coexistence, development without destruction, global trust through ethics and digital institutions. The project transforms war into the experience of peace, creates stability through polycentrism, digital property, and civic passive income, ensuring sustainable development and adaptation to global changes.